Written by: Dave Waller
Posted: 06/03/2013While homosexuality may be more
acceptable now in everyday life than in
years gone by, unfortunately the same can't
be said for the higher echelons of business.
Dave Waller investigates what needs to be
done to increase the acceptance of lesbians
and gay men in senior positions.
Is sexuality the last
taboo in the boardroom?
Ask Lord Browne. The
former BP boss found
out the hard way what can
happen when one's private
life suddenly blows up like an offshore oil
disaster. In 2006 it was the lies Browne told
to the High Court over his gay lover that
brought a brutal end to his esteemed 41 years
with the oil giant, rather than the fact that
he had a gay lover in the first place. But
his case also illustrates a wider ill – Browne
had apparently become so used to having to
hide his sexuality in his professional life that
he didn't think anything of misleading the
highest court in the land too.
Sexuality may not hold people back in
sectors like culture and the media – even
politics boasts more out MPs than ever before
– but few would argue that boardrooms of
major institutions are comfortable with
homosexuality. Indeed, in the Stonewall Top
100 Employers 2013 – the ‘definitive list of
Britain's most gay-friendly workplaces' – while
Accenture takes the top spot and Barclays, IBM
and Ernst & Young all rank in the top 10, the
rest of the list comprises primarily of councils,
police forces, universities and NHS Trusts.
When Lord Browne began airing his views
on the City last year it made for a wearying
read. Here's a gay man who rose through
his company to become one of the leading
figures in the oil industry, a sector he
described in The Telegraph as a “very macho
and sometimes homophobic environment”,
where “it was immediately obvious to me that
it was unacceptable to be gay”. And energy
isn't the only sector to suffer in this way. As
he also noted: “There appear to be no out gay
chief executive officers in the top companies
listed on the FTSE.” Browne is now partner
at private-equity group Riverstone, and
estimates that of the people he knows in this
sector “less than one per cent are openly gay”.
Which isn't to say we haven't made any
progress – note the likes of Ashley Steel,
the openly gay Vice Chairman of KPMG. But
individuals such as Steel are the exceptions
that prove the rule, and are often the first to
say there's still progress to be made. “Lots of
people complain that I didn't come out until
I was a partner,” says Steel. “And they said the
same of Lord Browne, who didn't for all that
time as CEO of BP. But those who are critical
tend not to realise that life 10 years ago was
so different to now. We've come a long way
towards understanding, but not the full way.”
Fear of the unknown
In 2003, the UK introduced laws to help tackle
workplace discrimination, covering sexuality
as well as race and gender. The Channel
Islands are finally looking to introduce similar
legislation this year. The question is, will
it make any difference? The issue in the UK
isn't so much about overt prejudice against
gay people. Often it's simply that a company's
culture isn't sufficiently open to give gay
people confidence that coming out will
be accepted, and this leaves many stuck on
the idea that they have an impossible choice
to make: being open about their true sexual
identity or succeed in their career.
“The reality is that many would like to
come out and be themselves but they just
can't be sure it's going to be OK,” says Steel.
“So they play safe. I did. And hiding my
identity like that for years undoubtedly
affected me. It meant I had to work harder,
to be careful what I said and how I behaved.
These were pressures that my colleagues
didn't have, and it's very hard.”
Steel's personal experience is backed
by research from The Center for Talent
Innovation in the US. Its Power of ‘Out'
survey found that 48 per cent of lesbian, gay,
bisexual or transgender (LGBT) respondents
report remaining ‘closeted' at work, but it was
‘out' workers who seemed to stand a better
chance of being promoted. Some 42 per cent
of closeted employees said they felt isolated
at work, against only 24 per cent of openly
LGBT employees.
Browne cited similar experiences at BP,
that the weight of hiding his identity was
a burden that made success even harder.
But that's not to say responsibility rests solely
within homosexual minds. While a company
may not explicitly discriminate, and may even
have an official gay-friendly policy in place,
individuals within the company may still
possess a bias against gay people. For some
managers this may be unconscious, where
they simply drop in assumptions about wives
and kids, or indulge the habit of promoting
others who seem most like them.
Others exhibit more odious habits. “I've
been in financial publishing for 13 years,” says
Nick Kirby, businesslife.co's openly gay Editorin-
Chief. “And I've seen first-hand and heard
of both insidious and blatant homophobia at
some of the UK's largest organisations. I had
a friend who worked at Morgan Stanley who
was asked: ‘What did you do at the weekend,
dance around in a dress?' It's largely puerile
stuff from the type of person who hasn't
moved on from the schoolyard, yet it can veer
from the snide to the downright aggressive.”
Positive steps
If this sort of ribbing is hard to endure, it's
similarly hard to monitor too. The Channel
Islands don't currently have any legislation
around homophobia in the workplace, but in
Jersey the Scrutiny Panel is currently looking
at a draft discrimination law, which will cover
sexuality along with race and gender and
is likely to be introduced this year. But with
discrimination often so intangible, it's hard to
imagine how legislation can really be effective.
“It's an incredibly difficult issue to police,”
says Carl Parslow, Founder of Parslow's,
a Jersey law office. “How do you get the
evidence that coming out has caused you not
to get the promotion that you would have if
you weren't gay?” Parslow's feeling is that the
Channel Islands' experience will mirror that
of the UK. When reports following the UK
discrimination law asked victims whether,
with the new laws in place, they'd be more
or less likely to take up their grievance, many
said they'd still shy away from complaining.
“It's not empowering people, as they're still
concerned about their career progress,” says
Parslow. “Yes the regulation is in place, but
it'll still take years to get to grips with it.”
So what are the solutions? Many companies
now offer support for LGBT employees. As
with the laws, this is a positive step, yet it's
easy to imagine this alone won't stop some
making decisions based on prejudice. All
it takes is one line manager with their own
issues or old-school outlook to totally affect
someone's behaviour and self-perception.
Companies must do all they can to be seen
to be promoting on merit, ensuring they
adhere to all the policies and train managers
to identify workplace discrimination and act
when it happens. Browne feels change needs
“rigorous performance measurement”, the
establishment of “concrete targets”. Meanwhile
organisations such as Out on the Street (see
opposite) in the US have emerged to promote
communication on the issue.
As usual, it should flow from the top: the
more senior gay people speak out, the easier
it will be for junior staff to do so. “Those at
the top of companies aren't sending out clear
enough signals that it's OK to be out,” says
Steel. “Until this happens, people will simply
ask: ‘why risk it?'”
The good news is that while the Channel
Islands' legislation may be slow coming in,
that doesn't reflect the attitude of its
population. ‘Provincial' here isn't a by-word
for ‘backward'. Steven Laffoley-Edwards, who
is in a civil partnership and was instrumental
in the campaign that succeeded in getting
Civil Partnerships accepted in Jersey in April
2012, says the Channel Islands are a tolerant
place. “We were ready with all the stats
to back up the argument, but when it came
down to it they all said ‘yeah, of course,
that makes sense'. They didn't even need the
evidence. The law was simply catching up
with the will of the people.”
Indeed, while businesslife.co knows of a
number of out gays and lesbians working in
top law firms, financial services companies
and government on the Channel Islands, all
were unwilling to speak to us – not because
they were concerned by perception, but more
that they didn't want to be seen as a ‘poster
boy' (or girl) for an issue that they didn't feel
actually is an issue. The islands may well be
ahead of the mainland on that point at least.
with the will of the people.”
What lies at the root of this whole issue
is society. There are any number of deeply
entrenched reasons why some are reluctant
to accept homosexuality, from religion to
family upbringing. And while the general
acceptance of gay marriage these days shows
that people have less of a problem with it,
track record suggests it may be a while before
financial institutions are absolutely open.
“The UK's business world is still dominated
and driven by straight white men,” says Steel.
“We haven't even sorted out the gender or
race issues yet – let alone sexuality.”
Out on the Street
‘The Street' in this LGBT leadership
organisation's name is Wall Street, showing
its financial institutions still need a kick
up the backside when it comes to equality.
Out on the Street's stated mission is ‘to
engage both gay and straight senior leaders
in discussions around making the Street a
destination for top talent, and to enhance
the careers of LGBT senior leaders
by creating connections to increase
opportunities for business'.
It certainly packs the right kind of
punch. Its leadership committee brings
together figures at or above director level
from such organisations as Morgan Stanley,
Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.
As well as hosting annual summits, it's
released a series of white papers called
Thinking Outside the Closet: How Leaders
Can Leverage the LGBT Talent Opportunity.
And it's not just happening in the US.
Out on the Street held its first European
summit in the UK in 2012, encouraging
the likes of Lord Browne to speak publicly
on the issue for the first time. If leaders
on this side of the pond follow suit, trickledown
change may be just a matter of time.